|
|
Post by jasmin2sable on Aug 4, 2019 6:12:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jasmin2sable on Aug 19, 2019 5:26:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jasmin2sable on Aug 19, 2019 5:28:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jasmin2sable on Aug 19, 2019 6:09:47 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jasmin2sable on Aug 19, 2019 6:11:34 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jasmin2sable on Aug 19, 2019 6:17:32 GMT
Anonymous: Can you tell a little bit about Jackie's relationship with her father? sophieandbrianna-deactivated201: Sure! Between her mother and father, Jackie was much more closer to her father, “Black Jack” Bouvier. She spent ample amount of time with him, and she admired him! They were so close in fact that many people described as a relationship that a couple would have rather than son and daughter. He took her on car rides and would point out all of the women he slept with. It became a game where Jackie would pick out a lady and ask, “That one, daddy?” And he would say yes or no. His nickname for her was “Jacks,” and he cared very deeply for her. She wanted nothing but to please him, and he only wanted her affection. In his later years after his divorce from Janet, he needed Jackie’s affection almost like a drug. When she was in college, she wrote him letters as often as she good and when she didn’t write him “enough,” Black Jack would either call or write her and ask why she wasn’t writing him often. He was a drunk, and if Jackie wasn’t around constantly, he began feeling sorry for himself and went into a pity drunk. Yet, Jackie worshipped her father and he worshipped her. He would buy her gifts all the time and spoil her endlessly. It was him she wanted to walk her down the aisle at her wedding, and because Janet hated him, she wouldn’t let Black Jack walk his daughter. She was destroyed, and some accounts have said you could still tears on her cheek and her red, puffy eyes when she walked on the arm of Hugh Auchincloss. They had a very close relationship, and when he died, Jackie was pregnant with Caroline I believe. Her doctor told her not to fly, but she did anyways to see him before he died. She didn’t make it in time and rushed into the door the minute he died. Black Jack called for Jackie endlessly, and he though the nurse was Jackie right before he died. He held her hand and called out her name. Jackie planned his funeral, every single detail of it, and she regretted not seeing him when he got sick. I hope this helps! I can tell you more if you want!  |
|
|
|
Post by jasmin2sable on Aug 19, 2019 18:44:58 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jasmin2sable on Aug 22, 2019 22:20:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jasmin2sable on Sept 25, 2019 23:57:44 GMT
Mykola Vladislavovich Zlochevsky (Ukrainian: Микола Владиславович Злочевський; born June 14, 1966 in Kiev) is a Ukrainian businessman and politician who was Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources from July 2010 till April 2012 and was the deputy secretary for Economic and Social Security on the National Security and Defense Council from April 2012 until February 2014 when Euromaidan occurred.[1][2][3]
Biography[edit]
He served in the first cabinet and the second cabinet[citation needed] of Mykola Azarov under President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych. In 2002, he co-founded the largest independent oil and natural gas company Burisma Holdings with Ukrainian businessman Mykola Lisin [uk].[4][5] Thourgh his sole ownership of Cyprus-registered Burisma Holdings, he owns the Ukrainian gas and oil producers Aldea, Pari, Esko-Pivnich, and the First Ukrainian Petroleum Company and the investment group Brociti Investments.[6][7][8][9][10][11][excessive citations]
At the end of 2014, Zlochevsky fled Ukraine amid allegations of unlawful self enrichment and legalization of funds (Article 368-2, Criminal Code of Ukraine) during his tenure in public office.[12] At the end of 2016 the Central Criminal Court in London released $23 million that were blocked on accounts of Zlochevsky.[12] As the Serious Fraud Office press service explained, the reason why the funds were released was due to the fact that it never obtained necessary evidences.[12] According to another ran-away former Ukrainian parliamentary Oleksandr Onyshchenko, Zlochevsky might have paid some money to close investigations against him in Ukraine.[13]
Zlochevsky returned to Ukraine in February 2018 after investigations into his Burisma Holdings had been completed in December 2017 with no charges filed against him.[9][14]
On April 18, 2018, recordings of conversations between President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko and Zlochevsky were released which implicated him in graft.[3][15][16]
On June 15, 2018, after the Solomyansky District Court in Kyiv had annulled the ruling of the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAP) to close a criminal proceeding against him in 2017, Zlochevsky was accused of having illegally issued, while he was Ecology Minister in 2010–2012, oil and gas licenses to the companies that belonged to him.[17].
|
|
|
|
Post by jasmin2sable on Sept 26, 2019 0:23:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jasmin2sable on Sept 26, 2019 0:33:52 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jasmin2sable on Sept 26, 2019 0:41:57 GMT
"As the Kyiv Post has previously reported, the accusations are not backed up by any solid evidence. Shokin was not investigating the younger Biden......" Nice Try KP. While true YOU didn't mention the OWNER of the company was being investigated and why he was paying Biden Jr. $50,000 EACH month which equates to $600,000 a year. Ya think that is called influence peddling? Ya know access to the VP of the U.S.? Nor did you mention the names of the Democrats in the U.S. Congress that wrote a letter to Lutsenko to NOT STOP investigations that could harm Trump and to withhold aid to Ukraine should Lutsenko not comply. So why the double standard KP? hotair.com/archives/jazz-shaw/2019/09/25/no-biggie-dem-senators-biden-threatened-ukraine-funding-trump-investigation/Here is something else for the KP. Joe Biden, in his capacity as VP of the U.S., led the Obama Administrations efforts in Ukraine WHILE Biden's son worked for Burisma. That is called a conflict of interest and Joe Biden IS and WAS legally mandated to recuse himself from dealing with Ukraine. So KP why did Joe Biden violate U.S. Law and not recuse himself? |
|
|
|
Post by jasmin2sable on Sept 26, 2019 4:47:07 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jasmin2sable on Sept 28, 2019 1:08:50 GMT
The Washington Free Beacon reports:
Leshchenko rejected the ABC story just hours after it was published, telling Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty’s Christopher Miller that he “DID NOT tell ABC insistence for leaders to discuss Biden probe was precondition for call.” Leshchenko also spoke to BBC’s Jonah Fisher, who added that the former Ukrainian official learned of “quid pro quo” rumors “only from media reports.”
Though Leshchenko advised the Zelensky administration through its post-election transition, the administration distanced itself from Leshchenko as early as May. He was not advising Zelensky during the July 25 call between Zelensky and Trump.
Several major outlets, including Axios and the Hill, jumped on ABC’s scoop. Though ABC News and Axios corrected their articles to note that Leshchenko no longer advises Zelensky, the Hill did not allude to Leshchenko’s status at all, referring to him as “an adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.”
ABC News added an update Thursday admitting Leshchenko “did not know if officials had viewed discussing Biden as a precondition for a meeting,” but still led the story with the original comments suggesting otherwise. Axios did not directly address Leshchenko’s dispute and defended the story’s underlying claim.
The Fake News Media badly wants this story to be true.
That’s why outlets like ABC News adopt a “shoot first and ask questions later” approach to stories that confirm their anti-Trump biases.
We will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.
|
|
|
|
Post by jasmin2sable on Sept 28, 2019 1:12:12 GMT
Breitbart News reports:
According to Buchanan, this appeared to be the latest chapter in the “Deep State-media alliance” going against Trump.
“Behind this all is what?” Buchanan said. “It is the Deep State-media alliance in this city, which is resisting and attempting to overthrow the government the American people have imposed upon them. Issue after issue it is the same thing and involves these two warring factions in this city.”
He predicted this would backfire on Biden’s candidacy because it would raise questions about Biden’s son.
“Let me tell you who is going to be the loser here: It’s going to be Joe Biden because all this stuff — if it goes to the Hill, people are going to say, ‘What is he talking about, Biden and Ukraine? What happened over there? What did Hunter Biden do? Let’s get all those details out. You get the Freedom Caucus — they’ll be all over this.”
For years, there has been speculation that Biden abused his status as Vice President to financially benefit his son.
From China to the Ukraine, there is ample evidence to warrant an investigation.
And if it is actually looked into, it could bring Biden’s entire campaign crashing down.
|
|
